The following problem looks weird at first but it’s really not. The problem basically comes from my (successful) attempt to prove the following nice-looking limit in multi-variable calculus
I have explained that in the remark below the problem.
Problem. Show that
Solution. First notice that, since (see this post!), we have
Hence, since we get
by the squeeze theorem, and thus
Let
Using the Maclaurin series of it’s clear that
and so
We now find the limits of the sequences on the LHS and the RHS of First, the LHS one. The substitution gives
and hence
because, as we showed here, for any and any continuous function
Now we find the limit of the sequence on the RHS of The idea is the same. We first make the substitution to get
The function is decreasing and so it has an inverse, i.e. we can find in terms of but to avoid the unnecessary mess, let’s just write Then the substitution and give
and so, again using the fact that for any and any continuous function we have
So and the squeeze theorem together give and the result follows from
Remark (for those readers who are familiar with multi-variable calculus). It follows from the above problem that
That’s because we can write and thus
and the result follows because
by the above problem.